Contingent fees and litigation settlement
نویسنده
چکیده
Policy makers and static economic models often argue that contingent fees cause lawyers to settle cases sooner than their clients would like, so as to avoid accumulating costs of bargaining. Yet, in a dynamic setting, a willingness to sink costs can be a strategic advantage when seeking to establish the credibility of threats. This paper shows that this can be the case for cost-bearing contingent fee lawyers who, through such “hard bargaining,” may increase the settlement offers they receive from defendants. However, two opposing tendencies are identified, which leave the overall effects on settlement timing ambiguous and plaintiffs often failing to benefit from this strategy. © 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc.
منابع مشابه
Contingency Fees, Settlement Delay and Low-Quality Litigation: Empirical Evidence from Two Datasets
Although flat fees are common for divorces, wills and trusts and probate, lawyers in personal injury cases generally are paid by contingency fee or at an hourly rate. Arguments have been made that contingency fees increase low-quality, "frivolous" litigation but counter-arguments suggest that contingency fees actually limit such litigation and instead it is hourly-fees that increase low-quality...
متن کاملLegal expenses insurance , risk aversion and litigation ∗
The risks involved in litigation are well documented; they include the risk of incurring legal expenses. While much literature focuses on contingent fees as a mechanism for litigants to shift this risk, there is little work on legal expenses insurance—the dominant means of shifting this risk in Europe. In our model, a risk averse plaintiff may purchase legal expenses insurance. The defendant ma...
متن کاملFrom butts to Big Macs--can the Big Tobacco litigation and nation-wise settlement with states' attorneys general serve as a model for attacking the fast food industry?
In 1998, after decades of litigation, the major tobacco companies negotiated a settlement reimbursing the Medicare expenses that forty-six states incurred to treat citizens suffering from the adverse effects of smoking. This settlement, as well as its preceding litigation, introduced a new method through which unpopular industries could be persuaded, if not forced, to change their business prac...
متن کاملLitigation, Economics of Basic Framework
This article begins by introducing the basic economic framework for studying litigation and out-of-court settlement. One set of issues addressed is positive (or descriptive) in nature. Under what conditions will someone decide to file suit? When do cases settle out of court? Normative issues are also addressed. Are these private litigation decisions in the interest of society more broadly? Next...
متن کاملThe Plaintiff’s Attorney in the Liability Insurance Claims Settlement Process: A Game Theoretic Approach
The decision of a claimant to obtain legal counsel, the timing of this decision, and the impact on the settlement amount an insurer successfully can offer are the focus of this study. This paper draws on strategic models of litigation/settlement with endogenous settlement amounts in the law and economics literature, but differs by endogenizing the decision to hire an attorney and its timing. Th...
متن کامل